1. Throughout the exercise I witnessed many roles taken by our team members. Each one of us were contributors, giving our synopsis on why each suspect could be ruled out. Amanda was a calibrator and coordinator when it came to putting our ideas together. The person that took the paper up to Professor Sheep was the completer. Myself I think I was mostly a critic and a consul. I looked at the ideas and threw out the reasons that were not suffice.
2. Each person that had their own sheet had to be a communicator, if they didn't the group would have missed critical information to incriminate the suspects. Also, the calibrator was key to our teams success, putting the pieces together to fill our sheet was critical. Though we didn't win, we came in second since we had these roles played on our team, it just took us a little longer.
3. I feel our team is much more developed now than at the beginning of class. We used to all be hesitant to contribute because we didn't know how our team would respond. Now we all work together letting each member contribute what they know, this was evidenced by how we solved the mystery despite the three different crime summary sheets.
Kyle Gierke
No comments:
Post a Comment